By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6

Displaying 488 of 1656      Previous | Next

Samkhyakarika of Isvarakrsna: With the Commentary of Gaudapada (Translated into English with an Exhaustive Introduction and Notes)

Samkhyakarika of Isvarakrsna: With the Commentary of Gaudapada (Translated into English with an Exhaustive Introduction and Notes)






Specifications
Item Code: IDE292

by Dr. T.G. Mainkar

Hardcover (Edition: 2004)

Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan

Size: 8.7" X 5.7"
Pages: 211
Price: $27.00   Shipping Free
Viewed times since 5th Dec, 2010
Description
Introduction

Of the different systems of philosophical thought that evolved in ancient India, the Samkhya is perhaps the most important and the oldest one. It has exercised tremendous influence over practically all the different systems that came later. It is as much a child of the Upanisads, as much as the Vedanta itself, has something in it which goes to indicate its relations with Buddhism and Jainism too, and finally though regarded by the Vedanta as its principal opponent, has influenced the Vedantic thought as well. Samkara has been quite candid in admitting the greatness of this thought when he observed that this thought was full of logic (yuktigadha) and was accepted by the great in the society (mahajana-parigrhita). From Samkara's own testimony it appears that the Samkhyas had tried to establish their claims too, for the support of the Upanisads. Samkara observes that it is his special aim to show that the explanation offered of the Upanisadic passages by the Samkhyas is not the correct explanation and that the correct explanation is the one offered by him, (Samkhyadayah svapaksasthapanaya vedantavakyani udahrtya…na samyag-vyakhyanam, p. 220) Samkara adds also that the Samkhyatantra was of weight (mahanti) and that its founder was held in considerable esteem (sarvajnabhasita). The main difference between the traditional approach and that of the Samkhyas appears to be that the Samkhyas insisted upon the use of Logic in philosophical matters and regarded it as having a far greater scope than the one given to it by those who admitted absolute authority of the Agamas, hence the use of the term Anumana by Badarayana as indicative of the Samkhya. The Samkhyas held that Reality was a matter that could be known through the other valid sources of knowledge (pramanantara-gamya) while the Vedanta appears to have held that it is only known through the Agamas (agama-gamya-artha). If all these things are put together, the Samkhya emerges out as a powerful rational thought, developed out of the Upanisadic hints by a powerful mind that had held sway over thinking minds and therefore was a serious rival of the Vedanta. Tradition is unanimous, though rather hazy, about ascribing the foundership of this celebrated rational and intellectual thought to Kapila.

CONTENTS

Introduction1-34
The Samkhyakarika35-208
Verse Index209-211

Displaying 488 of 1656      Previous | Next
Customer Comments
Post a Comment
 
 

Post Review
My Gallery
You can keep adding items you like to this gallery as a Wish List. If you Sign In we will remember your Gallery for your future reuse.
Delete | Add to Cart
Sign In | Register to save to My Gallery
Related Links
Related Items

ssl certificates
TRUSTe online privacy certification
We accept PayPal  VISA  MasterCard  Discover  American Express
Site Powered by www.unlimitedfx.com