Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Sign In  |  Sign up
Your Cart (0)
Best Deals
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > History > Kashmir, 1947 (Rival Versions of History)
Subscribe to our newsletter and discounts
Kashmir, 1947 (Rival Versions of History)
Pages from the book
Kashmir, 1947 (Rival Versions of History)
(Rated 4.0)
Look Inside the Book
Description

Preface

This book seeks to examine the accession of Kashmir to India in 1947, on the basis of the wealth of material that become available in recent years after crucial documents and correspondence of that period were made available to the public. Kashmir has been a bone of contention between Pakistan and India since 1947, and the cause of two out of the three wars that the two countries have fought since achieving independence. If their relations continue to deteriorate as they have been doing over the past three years, it could become the cause of a third.

When an issue generates so much bitterness and frustration, some of this feeling is bound to percolate to those attempting to study it. It is not therefore, surprising that over the years, two completely different versions of Kashmir’s accession to India have come into being, not only in peoples’ perceptions-that is only to be expected- but in the academic literature on the subject. These versions have then been fed into the popular perception through the media. Thus by degrees the distinction between scholarship and polemic has been eroded, to the detriment of the former.

This book examines both versions in the light of contemporary accounts, documents, and correspondence, which are exhaustively discussed in the footnotes. No attempt has been made to exhaustively study all the voluminous literature that exists on the Kashmir dispute. The method followed here has been to try and build up a clear, week by week, day by day, and finally hour by hour account of events and actions in 1946 and 1947, as these emerge from the sources enumerated above. The information contained in the declassified documents and correspondence files has to sift the statements made by the principal in their autobiographies and accounts of events, to determine what can and cannot be believed. On many occasions the correspondence has highlighted the significance of statements in the autobiographies that would otherwise have escaped my notice. The interpretations of other scholars have been tested against the account emerging from the above reconstruction.

I can no more claim to be unmoved by the events that are described in this book, than can the dozens of people who have written on the subject to Kashmir before me. Rather than make claims to objectivity, I consider it fairer readers to spell out the framework of values within which I have studied this subject. Pakistanis believe, almost without exception, that Kashmir should in the natural course have been part of Pakistan, and that they were tricked, or coerced, out of it by a clever and deeply laid Congress plot. This belief is based on the fact that 77 per cent of the population of the original princely state was Muslim, and Pakistan was created on the basis of the theory that Hindus and Muslims were two different nations. If one has an implicit faith in this theory, the rest is its natural corollary.

This implicit belief has permeated a great deal of the literature on the subject, particularly the writings of non-Indians. The way it has biased academic investigation, by predetermining what the writer believes was natural or morally right, is reflected in the two basic premises with which the British scholar Alastair Lamb begins his most recent book on Kashmir:

First did those of British India with viable Muslim majorities have the right to look forward to an independent future free from Hindu domination? [Emphasis added]... [and second] Had Jammu and Kashmir been an integral part of British India, there can be no doubt that it would automatically have been embraced within the Muslim side, Pakistan by the operations of the process of Partition.

The moral imperative in these two observations could not be more explicit: A ‘right’ is invoked, its denial is portrayed as the denial of freedom, and its extension to areas not covered by the original covenant is deemed to be morally desirable, if not an outright duty. The strong overload of morality inhibits Lamb, as it has inhibited other scholars, from addressing a number of additional of additional questions certainly deserving answers, such as: ‘did all Muslims want this “freedom”?’ Did “Muslim” constitute a homogeneous community with all the attributes of suppressed nationhood or were they a heterogeneous community with internal divisions?’ Were there no other loyalties that conflicted with their loyalty to their co-religionists?’ ‘In particular, did no class differences exist that might create a schism? For that matter, did “Hindu” themselves constitute a single homogeneous community?’ Did fully-fledged Hindu nationalism exist in 1947 or was it only incipient then? Did the term “Hindu” have any political, indeed any, significance at all?’

Assuming that Muslim interests, and the position of Muslims in Indian society did need safeguards, at least for psychological reasons, was Partition the only way of providing them? Considering that one-third of the Muslim population of the subcontinent was left behind in India, that their position deteriorated sharply after Partition and the communal holocaust that it engendered, and that their leaders migrated to Pakistan, can it even be claimed that Partition achieved its primary objective of freeing Muslims from Hindu dominance, or did it free some at the expense of the rest? Were no other political arrangements possible that would have safeguarded the position of all the Muslims of the subcontinent? Since British Indian had already introduced the elements of federal democracy with the passage of the Government of India Act of 1935, would a federal, or confederal, arrangement not have provided a better solution than Partition afforded?

Rather than attempt to answer these questions, I will leave it to readers to draw their own conclusions from the subsequent history of the India subcontinent. I will confine myself here to stating that I do not believe in the two-nation theory. Were I to do so, I would have to believe that 120 million Muslims have no rightful place in my India. I would find myself, ideologically, in the same bed as most rabid Hindu chauvinists. This does not mean that India and Pakistan should be reunited, much less forcibly. Nor does it imply that Pakistan has no reason to exist. While religion may nor have proved to be the most permanent basis for nationhood, Pakistan has now existed for almost half a century and is in the process of building other raisons d’ etre.

Contents

1

Two Versions of History

1

2

Uprising or Invasion?

11

3

Accession Under Duress?

36

4

Signing the Instrument of Accession

59

5

The Gurdaspur Award

74

6

A Grand Design?

83

7

Britain and the Kashmir Question

92

8

Myths Exploded, an Enigma Unravelled

119

Appendix I: Statement by Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw

133

Appendix II: Letter from General Iskander Mirza to Sir Olaf Caroe

139

Appendix III: The Truth of the Partition of the Punjab in August 1947

141

Index

145

 

Sample Pages









Kashmir, 1947 (Rival Versions of History)

Item Code:
NAL441
Cover:
Paperback
Edition:
2015
ISBN:
9780195648584
Language:
English
Size:
8.5 inch x 5.5 inch
Pages:
166
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 175 gms
Price:
$20.00   Shipping Free
Usually ships in 15 days
Look Inside the Book
Notify me when this item is available
Notify me when this item is available
You will be notified when this item is available
Your rating
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
Kashmir, 1947 (Rival Versions of History)
From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 6765 times since 12th Jan, 2016

Preface

This book seeks to examine the accession of Kashmir to India in 1947, on the basis of the wealth of material that become available in recent years after crucial documents and correspondence of that period were made available to the public. Kashmir has been a bone of contention between Pakistan and India since 1947, and the cause of two out of the three wars that the two countries have fought since achieving independence. If their relations continue to deteriorate as they have been doing over the past three years, it could become the cause of a third.

When an issue generates so much bitterness and frustration, some of this feeling is bound to percolate to those attempting to study it. It is not therefore, surprising that over the years, two completely different versions of Kashmir’s accession to India have come into being, not only in peoples’ perceptions-that is only to be expected- but in the academic literature on the subject. These versions have then been fed into the popular perception through the media. Thus by degrees the distinction between scholarship and polemic has been eroded, to the detriment of the former.

This book examines both versions in the light of contemporary accounts, documents, and correspondence, which are exhaustively discussed in the footnotes. No attempt has been made to exhaustively study all the voluminous literature that exists on the Kashmir dispute. The method followed here has been to try and build up a clear, week by week, day by day, and finally hour by hour account of events and actions in 1946 and 1947, as these emerge from the sources enumerated above. The information contained in the declassified documents and correspondence files has to sift the statements made by the principal in their autobiographies and accounts of events, to determine what can and cannot be believed. On many occasions the correspondence has highlighted the significance of statements in the autobiographies that would otherwise have escaped my notice. The interpretations of other scholars have been tested against the account emerging from the above reconstruction.

I can no more claim to be unmoved by the events that are described in this book, than can the dozens of people who have written on the subject to Kashmir before me. Rather than make claims to objectivity, I consider it fairer readers to spell out the framework of values within which I have studied this subject. Pakistanis believe, almost without exception, that Kashmir should in the natural course have been part of Pakistan, and that they were tricked, or coerced, out of it by a clever and deeply laid Congress plot. This belief is based on the fact that 77 per cent of the population of the original princely state was Muslim, and Pakistan was created on the basis of the theory that Hindus and Muslims were two different nations. If one has an implicit faith in this theory, the rest is its natural corollary.

This implicit belief has permeated a great deal of the literature on the subject, particularly the writings of non-Indians. The way it has biased academic investigation, by predetermining what the writer believes was natural or morally right, is reflected in the two basic premises with which the British scholar Alastair Lamb begins his most recent book on Kashmir:

First did those of British India with viable Muslim majorities have the right to look forward to an independent future free from Hindu domination? [Emphasis added]... [and second] Had Jammu and Kashmir been an integral part of British India, there can be no doubt that it would automatically have been embraced within the Muslim side, Pakistan by the operations of the process of Partition.

The moral imperative in these two observations could not be more explicit: A ‘right’ is invoked, its denial is portrayed as the denial of freedom, and its extension to areas not covered by the original covenant is deemed to be morally desirable, if not an outright duty. The strong overload of morality inhibits Lamb, as it has inhibited other scholars, from addressing a number of additional of additional questions certainly deserving answers, such as: ‘did all Muslims want this “freedom”?’ Did “Muslim” constitute a homogeneous community with all the attributes of suppressed nationhood or were they a heterogeneous community with internal divisions?’ Were there no other loyalties that conflicted with their loyalty to their co-religionists?’ ‘In particular, did no class differences exist that might create a schism? For that matter, did “Hindu” themselves constitute a single homogeneous community?’ Did fully-fledged Hindu nationalism exist in 1947 or was it only incipient then? Did the term “Hindu” have any political, indeed any, significance at all?’

Assuming that Muslim interests, and the position of Muslims in Indian society did need safeguards, at least for psychological reasons, was Partition the only way of providing them? Considering that one-third of the Muslim population of the subcontinent was left behind in India, that their position deteriorated sharply after Partition and the communal holocaust that it engendered, and that their leaders migrated to Pakistan, can it even be claimed that Partition achieved its primary objective of freeing Muslims from Hindu dominance, or did it free some at the expense of the rest? Were no other political arrangements possible that would have safeguarded the position of all the Muslims of the subcontinent? Since British Indian had already introduced the elements of federal democracy with the passage of the Government of India Act of 1935, would a federal, or confederal, arrangement not have provided a better solution than Partition afforded?

Rather than attempt to answer these questions, I will leave it to readers to draw their own conclusions from the subsequent history of the India subcontinent. I will confine myself here to stating that I do not believe in the two-nation theory. Were I to do so, I would have to believe that 120 million Muslims have no rightful place in my India. I would find myself, ideologically, in the same bed as most rabid Hindu chauvinists. This does not mean that India and Pakistan should be reunited, much less forcibly. Nor does it imply that Pakistan has no reason to exist. While religion may nor have proved to be the most permanent basis for nationhood, Pakistan has now existed for almost half a century and is in the process of building other raisons d’ etre.

Contents

1

Two Versions of History

1

2

Uprising or Invasion?

11

3

Accession Under Duress?

36

4

Signing the Instrument of Accession

59

5

The Gurdaspur Award

74

6

A Grand Design?

83

7

Britain and the Kashmir Question

92

8

Myths Exploded, an Enigma Unravelled

119

Appendix I: Statement by Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw

133

Appendix II: Letter from General Iskander Mirza to Sir Olaf Caroe

139

Appendix III: The Truth of the Partition of the Punjab in August 1947

141

Index

145

 

Sample Pages









Post a Comment
 
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Based on your browsing history
Loading... Please wait

Items Related to Kashmir, 1947 (Rival Versions of History) (History | Books)

The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012 (Set of 2 Volumes)
by A.G. Noorani
Hardcover (Edition: 2013)
Tulika Books
Item Code: NAF576
$90.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
CONFLICT UNENDING: India-Pakistan Tensions since 1947
Item Code: IDG022
$33.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Puffin History of India For Children Volume 2 (1947 to the Present)
by Roshen Dalal
Paperback (Edition: 2014)
A Puffin Original
Item Code: IHL348
$31.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Across The LOC: Inside Pakistan-Administered Jammu and Kashmir
Deal 20% Off
by Luv Puri
Hardcover (Edition: 2010)
Penguin Group
Item Code: NAB912
$28.50$22.80
You save: $5.70 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah: Tragic Hero of Kashmir
Item Code: NAH014
$31.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Kashmir:  A Tale of Partition (Set of 2 Volumes)
by M.G. Chitkara
Hardcover (Edition: 2002)
APH Publishing Corporation
Item Code: NAK486
$125.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
A Constitutional History of Jammu and Kashmir
Item Code: NAL809
$36.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Jammu and Kashmir Dilemma of Accession (A Historical Analysis and Lesson)
by Radha Rajan
Hardcover (Edition: 2017)
Voice of India, New Delhi
Item Code: NAN520
$21.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Danger in Kashmir
by Josef Korbel
Hardcover (Edition: 2016)
Shubhi Publications, Gurgaon
Item Code: NAL885
$57.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Crafting Peace in Kashmir: Through A Realist Lens
Deal 20% Off
Item Code: IDE646
$33.00$26.40
You save: $6.60 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
A Tangled Web  (Jammu & Kashmir)
by Ira Pande
Hardcover (Edition: 2011)
Harper Collins Publishers
Item Code: NAG913
$51.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Jammu and Kashmir: A State in Turbulence
Deal 20% Off
by Narender Sehgal
Paperback (Edition: 2011)
Suruchi Prakashan
Item Code: NAJ818
$16.00$12.80
You save: $3.20 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Testimonials
I received the two books today from my order. The package was intact, and the books arrived in excellent condition. Thank you very much and hope you have a great day. Stay safe, stay healthy,
Smitha, USA
Over the years, I have purchased several statues, wooden, bronze and brass, from Exotic India. The artists have shown exquisite attention to details. These deities are truly awe-inspiring. I have been very pleased with the purchases.
Heramba, USA
The Green Tara that I ordered on 10/12 arrived today.  I am very pleased with it.
William USA
Excellent!!! Excellent!!!
Fotis, Greece
Amazing how fast your order arrived, beautifully packed, just as described.  Thank you very much !
Verena, UK
I just received my package. It was just on time. I truly appreciate all your work Exotic India. The packaging is excellent. I love all my 3 orders. Admire the craftsmanship in all 3 orders. Thanks so much.
Rajalakshmi, USA
Your books arrived in good order and I am very pleased.
Christine, the Netherlands
Thank you very much for the Shri Yantra with Navaratna which has arrived here safely. I noticed that you seem to have had some difficulty in posting it so thank you...Posting anything these days is difficult because the ordinary postal services are either closed or functioning weakly.   I wish the best to Exotic India which is an excellent company...
Mary, Australia
Love your website and the emails
John, USA
I love antique brass pieces and your site is the best. Not only can I browse through it but can purchase very easily.
Indira, USA
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2020 © Exotic India